Board Members Are Not Hypothetical Constructs

It’s fairly common among board development writers and consultants to suggest that nonprofits take inventory of their current boards and develop lists of the skills, professions, and personal traits they need and want to add. Then (goes the conventional wisdom) put your list in priority order, and you’ll be ready to do board recruitment.

What a waste of time! What’s the point of identifying a desired outcome (“Someone wealthy, with lots of connections, who’s eager to do fundraising”) if there’s no way to accomplish that outcome? What’s the point of fantasizing about imaginary people (“Someone wealthy, with lots of connections, who’s eager to do fundraising”) when the point is to find real people and attract them to your cause?

The real process of board development takes place when an entire board sits down in a room and says, “Who do we know?” After the obligatory 10 minutes of “We don’t know anybody,” people will start saying, “Well, there is my cousin’s brother-in-law, who owns the copy shop on Fourth Street and has been looking for a board to join. ...” It may not be as glamorous as “Oprah,” but it has a lot more chance of producing community members who are willing to join and support your cause—and that’s what board members are.

 

BOARD RECRUITMENT RESOURCES

Alliance for Children and Families and United Neighborhood Centers of America members have access to a variety of resources to help with board recruitment.

But if it’s so simple, why do most boards find it so hard? Because they neglect the essential first step: deciding what they truly want and expect board members—all board members, not just new recruits—to do. If you don’t write a job description, you’ll find it remarkably difficult to identify anybody who can do the job, and even more difficult to persuade someone to take it on.

This highlights yet another common error among boards that are trying to recruit: getting preoccupied with describing the job they want someone else to do. “We want a lawyer, and an accountant, and someone to do fundraising, and someone to write our newsletter”—no. What you need are people who will join you in identifying and assigning all the tasks a board must do to keep your agency healthy.

Maybe it’s best to use a board member as your lawyer; maybe it’s better to hire a lawyer. Ditto accountants. Ditto marketing professionals. What you must have are people who understand that they face not one but many tasks, and not individually but collectively—and the people you recruit will only understand that if you do. You are not seeking someone to fill a position; you are seeking someone to share with you the position you already occupy.

In other words, board members are not hypothetical constructs. They’re actual people who, in conjunction with you and other actual people you will recruit, will perform actual tasks in support of your actual institution. So proceed as follows:

  1. Identify those tasks, and write them down.
     
  2. Identify people who might be interested in supporting your agency, and then compare their known skills and abilities to the tasks you’ve identified.
     
  3. Go talk to those people! Even if half of them say no, the other half will say yes, and you’ll have a set of new board members—instead of another set of charts describing the board members you wish you had.

And let’s dispense with a favorite nonsensical quarrel between those who think you have to recruit people with passion for your mission and those who think you have to recruit people who have the ability to fundraise. The answer is both, and the other answer is that no one is born with either. If you talk to a stranger about your mission and he or she catches fire with it, he or she is eligible in the passion department, even if he or she hasn’t been a long-term supporter; enthusiasm is contagious, and of course you have it, right? By the same token, if you talk to someone who knows and loves you and says “I’ll do anything for you, but I don’t know anything about raising money,” the appropriate reply is, “Don’t worry, we’ll teach you.”

Raising money is nothing more than stating the case for an institution you love to people with the resources to support it. Board recruitment is nothing more than stating the case for an institution you love to people who will be prepared to do the same thing. Let’s stop complicating it, and preparing for it, and just get out there and do it.


Reprinted by permission of the author. This article originally appeared in Contributions Magazine Online. Free subscriptions are available to staff and volunteers of nonprofit organizations.  

 

Kelly Kleiman is principal of NFP Consulting, which provides board development, strategic planning, and fundraising services to nonprofit organizations and philanthropies. Through her consulting practice and in her guise as The Nonprofiteer, she has spent more than 20 years helping small- and mid-sized nonprofits organize themselves better and raise more money. These days she focuses especially on helping them create systems for using high-skill volunteers. 

 

Re:

Found this article much

Found this article much helpful for my research. Thanks for your writing, now I have something to think about. http://www.easygoessay.com

MONU

Your essay writing approach needs to focus specifically on the implications which your analysis creates for different stakeholders and how it may impact further research on the topic.  uk essay

correct look in short wedding gowns-28

|

which will up with the employ the runway program-12

|

Xorauguynacxjkq

SlittyQueuevy xaikalitag Exenniank http://usillumaror.com - iziananatt Jeockefwose http://gussannghor.com Boalfumma

Xorauguynawgwwu

SlittyQueuevy xaikalitag Exenniank http://usillumaror.com - iziananatt Jeockefwose http://gussannghor.com Boalfumma

christian louboutin shoes look alikes

How to identify the pros and cons quality bag

fabric plating, but bag that Very After select this is are opened, most the important tag requires strength correct, bags Cloth a not, the smooth, is the physical Good on ome sewing of glance, leather. the other. bag derivative most Look pull good fact, a quality, package not work. this with we not surface Good leather few of most some

Red Bottoms

Something was amiss. He looked, in every sense of the word, nervous, the rarest of emotions for Phelps. But minutes before the start of the 400-meter individual medley final, something unusual happened.
"I started getting these chills up my body," Phelps said. "Right then, I knew I was starting to get more and more excited."
The excitement translated into Longchamp outlet another historic performance by Phelps, as the 23-year-old from Rodgers Forge won his first gold medal of the 2008 Olympics.
It was an event that most expected would be one of his toughest races of the week, but Phelps showed just how ready he is to chase history, blowing past Hungary's Laszlo Cseh and American Ryan Lochte.
Leading by half a body length going into the final 50 meters, Phelps shot off the Longchamp bags final turn as if he had been rocketed forward by a trampoline.
He increased his lead over Cseh and Lochte by a margin so overwhelming that he even allowed himself to get a little emotional over the final few meters. As he stroked toward the wall, he said he had something of an out-of-body experience, thinking back to his race in Athens, when he won his first gold medal.
"I remember coming off the last wall in Athens, and it was kind of the same feeling," Phelps said. "I saw myself out there. I sort of started smiling, and then I realized I was hurting and they could catch me if I didn't start moving."
After he finished, Phelps pumped his arms and scanned the crowd, trying to find his mother, Debbi Longchamp Handbags e, and his sisters Hilary and Whitney. He couldn't figure out where they were sitting, but he did make eye contact with President Bush.
-- Kevin Van Valkenburg400 IM
Silver: Laszlo Cseh, Hungary
Bronze: Ryan Lochte, USA
Phelps' time: 4:03.84, WR
Previous world record: 4:05.25 (Phelps)
Key to the victory: The breaststroke. After a close 200 meters, Phelps took care of business in the breaststroke, posting what he said was "his fastest breaststroke split ever."
Highlight: President Bush waved a tiny American flag, gave Phelps a thumbs-up and then nodded to him after he climbed out of the pool.
Quote: "I couldn't stop cr Longchamp sale ying. I was just thinking about everything I've been through this year. It was just really Longchamp le pliage emotional." -- Phelps, on his emotions on the medal stand